Questions for the expert

Sample examination questions by service area. Search helps find wording; the final question depends on the source objects.

Which ethically significant ideas are expressed in the material?

Ethics examination of materials. Examination is not reduced to personal approval or disapproval. Legal classification, guilt and every reader's actual reaction cannot be established through analysis of the material alone.

How does an individual passage relate to the whole?

Ethics examination of materials. Examination is not reduced to personal approval or disapproval. Legal classification, guilt and every reader's actual reaction cannot be established through analysis of the material alone.

Which features may support an interpretation?

Ethics examination of materials. Examination is not reduced to personal approval or disapproval. Legal classification, guilt and every reader's actual reaction cannot be established through analysis of the material alone.

Which ideas relevant to the task are expressed directly and through context?

Examination of public statements. If the task requires linguistic, psychological or other knowledge, the composition of the examination is determined separately.

How are the reasoning and portrayal of participants organised?

Examination of public statements. If the task requires linguistic, psychological or other knowledge, the composition of the examination is determined separately.

Which alternative readings need to be considered?

Examination of public statements. If the task requires linguistic, psychological or other knowledge, the composition of the examination is determined separately.

Is the subject of examination defined?

Reviews of ethics expert reports. Review feasibility is agreed after checking the questions and relevant specialist competence; a different view of the material does not itself prove an error.

Are the findings supported by specific features?

Reviews of ethics expert reports. Review feasibility is agreed after checking the questions and relevant specialist competence; a different view of the material does not itself prove an error.

Are the full context and limits of competence taken into account?

Reviews of ethics expert reports. Review feasibility is agreed after checking the questions and relevant specialist competence; a different view of the material does not itself prove an error.

CallDiscuss your task